User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (LG-T370 AppleWebkit/531 Browser/Phantom/V2.0 Widget/LGMW/3.0 MMS/LG-MMS-V1.0/1.2 Java/ASVM/1.1 Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGT370 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Phantom Browser 2.0WebKit JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.23407 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebkit 531closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Phantom 2.0close LGT370mobile-browseryescloseclose0.197 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Java LGT370smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Phantom Browser 2.0close LGT370closeclosecloseclose0.015 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesJavaCrawler0.146 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
5.0WebKit 531 LGLGT370closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.427 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Phantom 2.0Webkit 531 LGT370mobile:featureyescloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close LGLG-T370Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.11603 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:27 | by ThaDafinser