User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.2.2; ru-ru; AC0732C Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Safari/534.30
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-563.php
Android 4.0Android 4.2unknown 3QQ-liteTabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 4.23QQ-liteTabletyesyes0.11203 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.2.2GenericAndroid 4.2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.281 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.2yes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.2.2closeAndroid 4.2.2AC0732Ccloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.061 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 534.30Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.402 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 534.30Android 4.2.2AC0732Ctabletyescloseclose0.1 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 42closeAndroid 4.2Tabletyesyescloseclose0.04201 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:26 | by ThaDafinser