User agent detail

LenovoA66t_TD/1.0 Android/2.2 (Linux; Android 2.2) Release/12.20.2010 Browser/WAP 2.0 AppleWebKit/530.17
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LenovoA66t_TD Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 530.17closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid 2.2LenovoA66mobile-browseryescloseclose0.267 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 2.2LenovoZ600smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 2.2closeAndroid 2.2LenovoA66t_TDcloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Webkit based browser WebKit 530.17Android 2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.409 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 530.17Android 2.2LenovoA66mobile:smartyescloseclose0.02 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android 2.2closeAndroid 2.2LenovoA66tSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.07702 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:26 | by ThaDafinser