User agent detail

adidxbot/2.0 (+http://search.msn.com/msnbot.htm)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-279.php
yesadidxbotBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesadidxbotBot/Crawler0.011 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
adidxbot 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close closeyesclose0.185 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yesBingBotSearch bot0.002 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesmsnbotclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesmsnbotCrawler0.062 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
MSN Bot closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.402 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesmsnbotclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:26 | by ThaDafinser