User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (MotorolaWebKit; U; /Windows CE 6.0) AppleWebKit/534.51 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/2.2.8.8 Mobile Safari/534.51
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-windowsce.yaml
Motorola WebKit Windows CE 6.0Webkit 534.51mobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 2.2.8.8closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari 2.2.8.8closeWindows 6.0GenericWindows Mobilemobile-browseryescloseclose0.181 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Mobile Safari 2.2WebKit Windows CE MotorolarolaWebKitsmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 2.2.8.8closeWindows CEclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari 2.2.8closeWindows CE closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 2.2.8.8closeWindows CE 6.0closecloseclosecloseclose0.051 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mobile Safari 2.2.8.8WebKit Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.406 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Motorola WebKit Webkit 534.51Windows CE 6.0mobile:featureyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 2.2.8.8closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux MotorolaEvokeFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.03001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:26 | by ThaDafinser