User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.2; Trident/3.1; XBLWP7; ZuneWP7; Nokia 920)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/manufacturer-nokia-windows.yaml
Mobile Internet Explorer 7.0Windows Phone 7Trident 3.1NokiaLumia 920mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 7.0Trident Win8 6.2Windows DesktopDesktop0.16205 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 7.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE Mobile 7.0closeWindows 6.2GenericWindows Phone 7mobile-browseryescloseclose0.211 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
IE Mobile 7.0Trident Windows Phone Nokia920smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 7.0closeWindows 8closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE Large Screen 7.0closeWindows Phone Nokia920closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 7.0closeWindows 8 closecloseclosecloseclose0.044 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer Mobile 7.0Trident 3.1 NokiaWindows Phone 7closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.403 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Mobile Internet Explorer 7.0Trident 3.1Windows Phone 7NokiaLumia 920mobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 7.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE 7.0closeWindows 8Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:25 | by ThaDafinser