User agent detail

SAMSUNG-SGH-E100/T2 UP.Browser/6.1.0.6 (GUI) MMP/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungSGH-E100 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.1 Mobile Phoneyes0.006 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SAMSUNG-SGH-E100 T2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.1.0.6close SamsungSGH-E100mobile-browseryescloseclose0.209 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.1 SamsungSGH-E100smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UP.Browser 6.1.0close SamsungSGH-E100closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.1.0.6 Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.401 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Openwave 6.1 SamsungSGH-E100mobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close SamsungSGH-E100Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.02501 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:24 | by ThaDafinser