User agent detail

SAMSUNG-GT-B7320L/1.0 Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 4.01; Windows CE; PPC)/UC Browser7.7.1.88
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungGT-B7320L Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 7.7WebKit Android Mobile Phoneyesyes0.03801 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 4.01closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 4.01closeWindows desktop-browsercloseclose0.194 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 7.7 Windows CE SamsungGT-B7320Lsmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 4.01closeWindows CEclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 7.7.1closeWindows CE SamsungGT-B7320Lcloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 4.01closeWindows CE closecloseclosecloseclose0.069 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 7.7.1.88 Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.402 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 7.7Gecko Windows Mobile SamsungB7320 OmniaPROmobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 4.01closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE Mobile closeWindows Mobile SamsungGT B7320LFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.02701 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:24 | by ThaDafinser