User agent detail

JUC(Linux;U;Android2.3.3;Zh_cn;SAMSUNG-SGH-I997R;480*800;)UCWEB7.8.0.95/139/444
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungSGH-I997R Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 7.8WebKit Android 2.3Mobile Phoneyesyes0.007 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
JUC closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser closeAndroid 2.3.3GenericAndroid 2.3mobile-browseryescloseclose0.308 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 7.8 Android SamsungSGH-I997Rsmartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 7.8.0closeAndroid 2.3.3SamsungSGH-I997Rcloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 7.8.0.95closeAndroid 2.3.3closecloseclosecloseclose0.107 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 7.8.0.95 Android Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.403 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 7.8 Android 2.3.3SamsungInfuse 4Gmobile:smartyescloseclose0.12 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 2.3closeAndroid 2.3Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:24 | by ThaDafinser