User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.24pre) Gecko/20100228 K-Meleon/1.5.4
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
K-meleon 1.5.4Windows XPGecko desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
K-Meleon 1.5Gecko WinXP 5.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.05102 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
K-Meleon 1.5.4closeWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.189 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
K-meleon 1.5Gecko Windows XPdesktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 1.8closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
K-Meleon 1.5.4closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
K-Meleon 1.5.4closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.075 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
K-Meleon 1.5.4Gecko 20100228Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
K-Meleon 1.5.4Gecko 1.8.1Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:23 | by ThaDafinser