User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0; http://www.pregnancycrawler.com)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
pregnancycrawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 6.0Trident Win2000 5.0Windows DesktopDesktop0.01901 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 6.0closeWindows 5.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.197 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closeWindows 2000closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyespregnancycrawlerclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 6.0closeWindows 2000 closecloseclosecloseclose0.046 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 6.0Trident Windows Windows NT 5.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.416 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Internet Explorer 6.0 Windows 2000desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close yescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:23 | by ThaDafinser