User agent detail

Googlebot-Image/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-618.php
yesGooglebot-ImageBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesGooglebot-ImageBot/Crawler0.012 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Googlebot-Image 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close closeyesGooglebot-Image/1.0close0.183 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yesGooglebotSearch bot0.002 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesGooglebot-Imageclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesGooglebot-ImageCrawler0.048 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Googlebot closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.497 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesGooglebot Imageclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesGooglebotclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:23 | by ThaDafinser