User agent detail

Spice M6800 Opera/9.80 (MTK; Nucleus; U; xx) Presto/2.4.18 Version/10.00
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-mre.yaml
Opera Mobile 10.00MRE Presto 2.4.18SpiceM6800mobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mobile 10.00Presto 2.2Android Mobile Phoneyesyes0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 10.00closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile 10.00closeMRE SpiceM6800mobile-browseryescloseclose0.197 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 10.00Presto MTK / Nucleus SpiceM6800 Operasmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 10.00close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 10.0close closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 10.00close closecloseclosecloseclose0.112 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 10.0Presto 2.4.18 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.406 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mobile 10.00Presto 2.4.18MRE SpiceM6800mobile:featureyescloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 10.00closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close SpiceM6800Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:23 | by ThaDafinser