User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/536.30.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/6.0.5 Safari/536.30.1 Installatron (Mimicking WebKit)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-513.php
Installatron 6.0Linux unknownunknown unknownLinux DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Installatron 6.0WebKit Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.07602 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 6.0.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 6.0.5close desktop-browsercloseclose0.201 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari 6.0WebKit 0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 6.0.5close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari 6.0.5close closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 6.0.5close closecloseclosecloseclose0.055 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari 6.0.5WebKit 536.30.1 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.417 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 536.30.1 closeclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 6.0.5closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:21 | by ThaDafinser