User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.1.2; SM-T211de_DE Build/JZO54K) AppleWebKit/ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/ Mobile Safari/
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungSM-T211de Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari WebKit Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.02201 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari closeAndroid 4.1.2GenericAndroid 4.1mobile-browseryescloseclose0.268 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.1SamsungGALAXY Tab 3 7.0"tabletyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.1.2closeAndroid 4.1.2SamsungSM-T211decloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.155 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.1.2Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.405 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit Android 4.1.2SamsungGalaxy Tab 3 (7.0)tabletyescloseclose0.028 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.1closeAndroid 4.1Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.04501 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:21 | by ThaDafinser