User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (SmartHub; SMART-TV; U; Linux/SmartTV+2014; Maple2012) AppleWebKit/537.42+ (KHTML, like Gecko) SmartTV Safari/537.42+
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/television/samsung.yaml
Webkit 537.42SamsungSmart TV 2014television Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 537.42closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 537.42closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.186 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari WebKit GNU/Linux SamsungSmart TVtv0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
WebKit Nightly 537.42closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.062 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
WebKit 537.42Smart TV closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.493 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 537.42 SamsungSmart TV 2014televisioncloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:21 | by ThaDafinser