User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; en-us; KFAPWI Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/535.19 (KHTML, like Gecko) Silk/3.16 Safari/535.19 Silk-Accelerated=true
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-267.php
Silk 3.16Android unknownunknown AmazonKindle Fire HDX 8.9Tabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Silk 3.16WebKit Android AmazonKindle Fire HDX 8.9Tabletyesyes0.06302 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Silk 3.16closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 535.19closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.268 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Mobile Silk 3.16Blink Android AmazonKindle Fire HDX 8.9" WiFitabletyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Amazon Silk 3.16closeAndroid AmazonKindle Fire HDX 8.9" WiFicloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.066 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Silk 3.16WebKit 535.19Fire OS AmazonKindlecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.406 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Silk 3.16Webkit 535.19FireOS 3AmazonKindle Fire HDX 8.9"tabletyescloseclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Amazon Silk Browser 3.1closeAndroid AmazonKFAPWITabletyesyescloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:21 | by ThaDafinser