User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; IRIS402 Build/LAVAIRIS402) AppleWebKit/535.19 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/18.0.1025.166 Mobile Safari/535.19
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LavaIris 402 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 18.0WebKit Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.07602 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.166closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 18.0.1025.166closeAndroid 4.2.2LavaIris 402mobile-browseryescloseclose0.329 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 18.0WebKit Android 4.2LavaIris 402smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.166closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 18.0.1025closeAndroid 4.2.2LavaIris 402closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Iris 402closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.057 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 18.0.1025.166WebKit 535.19Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.416 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 18Webkit 535.19Android 4.2.2LavaIris 402mobile:smartyescloseclose0.019 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.166closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 18closeAndroid 4.2LavaIris 402Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.05602 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:21 | by ThaDafinser