User agent detail

MQQBrowser/20 Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 1.6; zh-cn; HTC TOUCH DUAL Build/DRC83) AppleWebKit/528.5+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.1.2 Mobile Safari/525.20.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCTOUCH DUAL Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 3.1.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 3.1.2closeAndroid 1.6GenericAndroid 1.6mobile-browseryescloseclose0.299 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
QQ Browser 20WebKit Android 1.6HTCTOUCH DUALsmartphoneyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 3.1.2closeAndroid 1.6closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
QQ Browser Mobile 20closeAndroid 1.6HTCTOUCH DUALcloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 1.6closecloseclosecloseclose0.065 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
QQ Browser 20WebKit 528.5Android 1.6HTCcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.415 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
QQ Browser 2.0Webkit 528.5Android 1.6HTCTouch Dualmobile:smartyescloseclose0.017 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 3.1.2closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 44closeAndroid 1.6Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.05502 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:20 | by ThaDafinser