User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.1.2; zh-cn; Coolpad 9150 Build/JZO54K) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko)Version/4.0 MQQBrowser/5.1 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Coolpad9150 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 4.1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.016 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.1.2GenericAndroid 4.1mobile-browseryescloseclose0.251 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
QQ Browser 5.1WebKit Android 4.1Coolpad9150smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
QQ Browser Mobile 5.1closeAndroid 4.1.2Coolpad9150closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.119 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
QQ Browser 5.1WebKit 537.36Android 4.1.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.417 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
QQ Browser 5.1Webkit 537.36Android 4.1.2CoolpadAir 9150mobile:smartyescloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.1closeAndroid 4.1Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.04701 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:20 | by ThaDafinser