User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; ; U; Linux armv7l; zh-cn) AppleWebKit/534.26+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0 Safari/534.26+ Kindle SkipStone 1.0.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/ereader/amazon.yaml
Webkit 534.26AmazonKindle Touch or laterereaderyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari 5.0WebKit Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.03901 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Kindle SkipStonecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
SkipStone 1.0.1closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.182 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari 5.0WebKit GNU/Linux AmazonKindletabletyes0.013 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 5.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
SkipStone 1.0.1closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Skipstone 1.0.1closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.11 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Kindle Browser WebKit 534.26Fire OS Amazoncloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.405 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 534.26 AmazonKindle Touch or laterereaderyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 5.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 5.0closeX11 AmazonKindleOther Mobileyescloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:19 | by ThaDafinser