User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/43.0.2272.76 Safari/537.36 Seznam.cz/2.0.5
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-821.php
Seznam Browser 2.0WinXP 5.1unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Seznam Browser 2.0Blink WinXP 5.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.016 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 43.0.2272.76closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 43.0.2272.76closeWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.186 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 43.0Blink Windows XPdesktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 43.0.2272.76closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 43.0.2272closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.012 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 43.0.2272.76closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.06 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 43.0.2272.76WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.409 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome Dev 43.0.2272.76Blink Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 43.0.2272.76closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 43.0.2357.81closeWindows 8.1Desktopcloseclose0.01601 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:19 | by ThaDafinser