User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; S4004M Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/42.0.2311.107 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
Chrome 42.0Android 4.2unknown DNSS4004MMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 42.0Blink Android 4.2DNSS4004MMobile Phoneyesyes0.01701 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 42.0.2311.107closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 42.0.2311.107closeAndroid 4.2.2GenericAndroid 4.2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.286 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 42.0Blink Android 4.2smartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 42.0.2311.107closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 42.0.2311closeAndroid 4.2.2S4004Mcloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.073 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 42.0.2311.107WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 42Blink Android 4.2.2S4004Mmobile:smartyescloseclose0.091 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 42.0.2311.107closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.2closeAndroid 4.2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.03501 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:19 | by ThaDafinser