User agent detail

lwp-trivial/1.41
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
woothee/woothee-testset
/testsets/misc.yaml
HTTP Library perlUNKNOWN misc Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yeslwpBot/Crawler0.007 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
lwp-trivial 1.41closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
LWP::Simple 1.41close software-librarycloseclose0.24 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
No result found
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentStringCom
close closeclosecloseclosecloseyeslwp-trivialCrawler0.05 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
No result found
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesPerlclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
HTTP Library perlcloseclosecloseclosemiscclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:19 | by ThaDafinser