User agent detail

User-Agent: Mozilla/1.1N (X11; I; SunOS 4.1.2 sun4c)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-solaris.yaml
Netscape Navigator 1.1Solaris 1.0.1 desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesGeneric CrawlerBot/Crawler0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
User-Agent closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Netscape Navigator 1.1closeSolaris 1.0.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.188 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Solaris 4.1desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 1.1NcloseSunOS closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeSolaris closeclosecloseclose0.012 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Netscape Navigator 1.1N SunOS closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.377 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Netscape Navigator 1.1 Solaris 1.0.1desktopcloseclose0.016 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Teleca Obigo Q05Aclose Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:18 | by ThaDafinser