User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.1.1; de-; Touchlet X10.dual Build/JRO03H) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Safari/534.30
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
PearlX10.dual Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 4.1PearlTouchlet X10.DualTabletyesyes0.016 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.1.1GenericAndroid 4.1mobile-browseryescloseclose0.341 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.1yes0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.1.1closeAndroid 4.1.1PearlX10.dualcloseclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.075 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 534.30Android 4.1.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.457 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 534.30Android 4.1.1Touchlet X10.dualtabletyescloseclose0.108 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.1closeAndroid 4.1Tabletyesyescloseclose0.04801 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:17 | by ThaDafinser