User agent detail

MOT-MCCB/7582 UP.Browser/4.1.23 UP.Link/4.2.1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
MotorolaMCCB Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Openwave Mobile Browser 4.1 MotorolaMCCBMobile Phoneyes0.012 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MOT-MCCB 7582closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 4.1.23close mobile-browseryescloseclose0.186 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Openwave Mobile Browser 4.1 MotorolaMCCBsmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UP.Browser 4.1.23close MotorolaMCCBcloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 4.1.23 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.45 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Openwave 4.1 MotorolaMCCBmobile:featureyescloseclose0.013 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close MotorolaMCCBFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.02301 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:17 | by ThaDafinser