User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_8_4) AppleWebKit/536.30.1 (KHTML, like Gecko)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-318.php
Apple Mail 6.0MacOSX 10.8unknown AppleMacintoshDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Apple Mail 6.0WebKit MacOSX 10.8AppleMacintoshDesktop0.04301 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 536.30.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Apple Mail closeOS X 10.8.4email-clientcloseclose0.194 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Mac 10.8desktop0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeOS X 10.8.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
AppleMail 536.30.1closeMac OS X 10.8.4closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeOS X 10.8.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.105 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 5.0WebKit 536.30.1Mac OS X 10.8.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 536.30.1OS X Mountain Lion 10.8desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 8.0closeFedora Desktopcloseclose0.007 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:16 | by ThaDafinser