User agent detail

Mozilla 5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.2.2; zh-cn; ME811 Build SHDWR_X6_2.200.33) UC AppleWebKit 534.31 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile Safari 534.31
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
MotorolaME811 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesFake BrowserBot/Crawler0.005 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 534.31closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari closeAndroid 2.2.2GenericAndroid 2.2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.255 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 2.2MotorolaME811smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 2.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 2.2.2closeAndroid 2.2.2MotorolaME811closeclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 2.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.064 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
WebKit Android 2.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.409 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser Android 2.2.2MotorolaDroid Xmobile:smartyescloseclose0.023 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.11203 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:16 | by ThaDafinser