User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US) AppleWebKit/533+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Element Browser 5.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-513.php
Element Browser 5.0Win7 6.1unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Element Browser 5.0WebKit Win7 6.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.013 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 533closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Element Browser 5.0closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.195 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Windows 7desktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Element Browser 5.0closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.077 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 5.0WebKit 533Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.477 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 533Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:16 | by ThaDafinser