User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Symbian OS; 246) Opera 8.60 [zh-CN]SonyEricssonM600c/R100
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SonyEricssonM600c Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 6.0Trident Windows DesktopDesktop0.02001 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 8.60closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 8.60closeSymbian OS desktop-browsercloseclose0.194 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 8.60Presto Symbian OS Sony EricssonM600csmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera R100close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 8.60closeSymbian OS SonyEricssonM600ccloseclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 8.60closeSymbian OS closecloseclosecloseclose0.1 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 8.60 Symbian Sony EricssonSony Ericsson M600ccloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.411 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mobile 8.60 Sony EricssonM600cmobile:featureyescloseclose0.015 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:16 | by ThaDafinser