User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.0.1; zh-cn; XT800 Build/TITA_M2_15.10.1) AppleWebKit/525.10+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.0.4 Mobile Safari/523.12.2
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
MotorolaXT800 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 3.0WebKit Android Mobile Phoneyesyes0.04401 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 3.0.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 3.0.4closeAndroid 2.0.1MotorolaXT800mobile-browseryescloseclose0.274 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 2.0MotorolaXT800smartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 3.0.4closeAndroid 2.0.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 2.0.1closeAndroid 2.0.1MotorolaXT800closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 2.0.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.087 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 3.0.4WebKit 525.10Android 2.0.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.424 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 525.10Android 2.0.1MotorolaMOTO XT800mobile:smartyescloseclose0.025 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 3.0.4closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 2.0closeAndroid 2.0MotorolaXT800Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.05302 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:14 | by ThaDafinser