User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/538.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Otter/0.9.03 beta 3 Safari/538.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-788.php
Otter 0.9Linux unknownunknown unknownLinux DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Otter 0.9Blink Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.07402 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 538.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 538.1closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.223 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari WebKit GNU/Linux desktop0.012 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Otter 0.9.3closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.049 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
WebKit 538.1Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.472 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Otter 0.9.03Webkit 538.1Linux desktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:14 | by ThaDafinser