User agent detail

MQQBrowser/3.0/Mozilla/5.0 (HW-HUAWEI_C8500/C8500V100R001C92B234;U;Android/2.1;240*320;CTC/2.0) AppleWebKit/530.17 Mobile Safari/530.17
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-android.yaml
QQ Browser 3.0Android 2.1Webkit 530.17HuaweiC8500mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 530.17closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
QQbrowser 3.0closeAndroid GenericAndroidmobile-browseryescloseclose0.276 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
QQ Browser 3.0WebKit Android 2.1HuaweiC8500smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
QQ Browser Mobile 3.0closeAndroid 2.1closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 2.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.088 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
QQ Browser 3.0WebKit 530.17Android closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.412 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
QQ Browser 3.0Webkit 530.17Android 2.1HuaweiC8500mobile:smartyescloseclose0.015 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 2.1closeAndroid 2.1Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.02701 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:14 | by ThaDafinser