User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Series40; Nokia2010/11.81; Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1) Gecko/20100401 S40OviBrowser/2.0.2.68.14
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Nokia2010 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia Proxy Browser 2.0Gecko SymbianOS Nokia201Mobile Phoneyes0.03001 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
IBrowse close desktop-browsercloseclose0.199 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia Ovi Browser 2.0Gecko Symbian OS Series 40 Nokia2010smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser 11.81;closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Ovi Browser 2.0.2closeNokia Series 40 Nokia2010closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Mozilla close closecloseclosecloseclose0.053 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Ovi Browser 2.0.2.68.14Gecko 20100401NokiaOS NokiaNokia 2010closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.411 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Nokia Xpress 2.0.2Gecko Series40 Nokia2010mobile:featureyescloseclose0.013 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
S40 Ovi Browser 2.0closeNokia Series 40 Nokia2010Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.13104 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:14 | by ThaDafinser