User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.2.1; it-it; CUBOT ONE Build/JOP40D) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/534.30 ACHEETAHI/2100501044
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone.yml
Android Browser Android 4.2.1WebKit CUBOTONEsmartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
CM Browser WebKit Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.01701 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.2.1CubotOnemobile-browseryescloseclose0.262 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.2CUBOTONEsmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.2.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.2.1closeAndroid 4.2.1CubotONEcloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.062 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 534.30Android 4.2.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.406 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 534.30Android 4.2.1CubotOnemobile:smartyescloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close yescloseclose0.03801 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:14 | by ThaDafinser