User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (SymbianOS/9.2; U; Series60/3.1 NokiaE66-2/102.07.81; Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 ) AppleWebKit/413 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
NokiaE66-2 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari SymbianOS Mobile Phoneyes0.07802 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 413closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Nokia Web Browser closeSymbian OS 9.2NokiaE66mobile-browseryescloseclose0.184 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia OSS Browser 3.1WebKit Symbian OS Series 60 3.1NokiaE66-2smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia S60 OSS Browser 102.07.81;closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia OSS Browser 3.1closeSymbian OS 9.2NokiaE66-2closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Browser for S60 OSS 3.1closeSymbianOS 9.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.171 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser WebKit 413NokiaOS NokiaNokia E66-2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.406 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 413Series60 3.1NokiaE66mobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
SymbianOS closeclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Symbian S60 Browser closeSymbian S60 9.2NokiaE66Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.02901 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:14 | by ThaDafinser