User agent detail

QuickTime.7.7.4 (qtver=7.7.4;os=Windows NT 6.0Service Pack 2)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
QuickTime 7.7.4Windows Vista desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
QuickTime 7.7 WinVista 6.0Windows DesktopDesktop0.011 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
QuickTime closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
QuickTime 7.7.4closeWindows 6.0media-playercloseclose0.196 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
QuickTime 7.7 Windows Vistadesktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
closeWindows Vistaclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeWindows Vista closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Windows Windows NT 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.411 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
QuickTime 7.7.4 Windows Vistadesktopcloseclose0.023 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:14 | by ThaDafinser