User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Maemo; Linux armv7l; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110928 Firefox/7.0.1 Fennec/7.0.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-maemo.yaml
Firefox Mobile Fennec 7.0.1Maemo Gecko 7.0.1mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Fennec 7.0Gecko 2.0Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.05001 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 7.0.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Firefox 7.0.1closeLinux NokiaGeneric Maemo with Fennecmobile-browseryescloseclose0.18 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Fennec 7.0Gecko Maemo yes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 7.0.1closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox Mobile 7.0.1closeMaemo closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Fennec 7.0.1closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.076 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Fennec 7.0.1Gecko 20110928Maemo closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.412 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox Mobile Fennec 7.0.1Gecko 7.0.1Maemo mobile:smartyescloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 7.0.1closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Firefox 17.0closeMaemo NokiaGeneric Maemo with FennecFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:13 | by ThaDafinser