User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11;Unknown) AppleWebKit/525.20+ (KHTML,like Gecko) Chromium/24.0.1312.52 Chrome/24.0.1312.52 Safari/525.52+
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/camouflage.yaml
Chromium 24.0.1312.52 Webkit 525.20desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 24.0.1312.52closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chromium 24.0.1312.52close desktop-browsercloseclose0.184 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chromium 24.0WebKit 0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 24.0.1312.52close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chromium 24.0.1312close closeclosecloseclose0.011 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 24.0.1312.52close closecloseclosecloseclose0.085 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chromium 24.0.1312.52WebKit 525.20a UNIX based OS closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.407 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chromium 24.0.1312.52Webkit 525.20 desktopcloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 24.0.1312.52closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 24.0.1312.52closeUnknown Desktopcloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:13 | by ThaDafinser