User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1) AppleWebKit/537.11 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/23.0.1271.64 Safari/537.11
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Chrome 23.0.1271.64Windows XPWebKit desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 23.0WebKit WinXP 5.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.02201 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 23.0.1271.64closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 23.0.1271.64closeWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.186 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 23.0WebKit Windows XPdesktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 23.0.1271.64closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 23.0.1271closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 23.0.1271.64closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.065 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 23.0.1271.64WebKit 537.11Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.405 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 23Webkit 537.11Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 23.0.1271.64closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 23.0.1271.64closeWindows XPDesktopcloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:11 | by ThaDafinser