User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Java; U; Pt-br; samsung gt-c3510) AppleWebKit/530.13 (KHTML, like Gecko) UCBrowser/8.5.0.185/82/352/UCWEB Mobile, SAMSUNG-GT-C3510/C3510XXJI1 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 UP.Browser/6.2.3.3.c.1.102 (GUI) MMP/2.0 Untrusted/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Samsunggt-c3510 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.09003 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 530.13closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari close mobile-browseryescloseclose0.241 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 8.5WebKit Samsunggt-c3510smartphoneyes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.5.0close Samsunggt-c3510closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser close closecloseclosecloseclose0.057 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 8.5.0.185WebKit 530.13 SamsungMobilecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.405 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Openwave 6.2Webkit 530.13 Samsunggt-c3510mobile:featureyescloseclose0.013 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.0Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.01601 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:11 | by ThaDafinser