User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.3.4; fr-fr; STARTEXT II Build/GINGERBREAD) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, comme Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/533.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone-3.yml
Android Browser Android 2.3.4WebKit SFRStarText 2smartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 2.3.4GenericAndroid 2.3mobile-browseryescloseclose0.265 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 2.3SFRStarText 2smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 2.3.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 2.3.4closeAndroid 2.3.4STARTEXT IIcloseclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 2.3.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.052 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 533.1Android 2.3.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.409 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Gecko 533.1Android 2.3.4SFRSTARTEXT IImobile:smartyescloseclose0.045 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 2.3closeAndroid 2.3Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.02401 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:10 | by ThaDafinser