User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; U; Webster 0.1; Syllable) AppleWebKit/420+ (KHTML, like Gecko)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-syllable.yaml
Webster 0.1Syllable Webkit 420desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 420closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Apple Mail closeSyllable email-clientcloseclose0.212 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Syllable desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeSyllable closecloseclosecloseclose0.062 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 5.0WebKit 420 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.408 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webster 0.1Webkit 420Syllable desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:10 | by ThaDafinser