User agent detail

Microsoft Office/14.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Microsoft Outlook 14.0.4760; Pro; ms-office; MSOffice 14)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-317.php
Outlook 2010Win7 6.1unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Outlook 2010Trident Win7 6.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.012 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Microsoft closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Outlook 2010 closeWindows 6.1email-clientcloseclose0.2 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Windows 7desktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
closeChrome OS closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Outlook 2010closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.407 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Microsoft Office 14 Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.013 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE 11(Compatibility View)closeWindows 7Desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:10 | by ThaDafinser