User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux; de-DE) AppleWebKit/527 (KHTML, like Gecko, Safari/419.3) konqueror/4.3.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
Linux Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 419.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Konqueror 4.3.1closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.229 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Konqueror 4.3WebKit GNU/Linux desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Konqueror 4.3.1closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.06 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Konqueror 4.3.1WebKit 527Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.407 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Konqueror 4.3.1Webkit 527Linux desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:10 | by ThaDafinser