User agent detail

DoCoMo/1.0/N505i/c20/TB/W24H12
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
woothee/woothee-testset
/testsets/mobilephone_docomo.yaml
docomo N505idocomo mobilephone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
DoCoMo 1.0 JAVA NECN505iMobile Phoneyes0.01501 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
DoCoMo 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
NetFront close DoCoMomobile-browseryescloseclose0.181 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
DoCoMoN505ifeature phoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
N505icloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.433 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
NECN505imobile:featureyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
docomo N505icloseclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close DoCoMoN505iFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.02201 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:09 | by ThaDafinser