User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (J2ME/MIDP; Opera Mini/8.0.40313/36.1649; U; kk) Presto/2.12.423 Version/12.16
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
Opera Mini 8.0JAVA unknown2.8 unknowngeneral Mobile PhoneMobile Phoneyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mini 8.0Presto 2.8JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 12.16closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mini 8.0.40313closeJVM OperaMini 5mobile-browseryescloseclose0.184 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Mini 8.0Presto 0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera Mini 8.0.40313close closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mini 8.0.40313close closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera Mini 8.0.40313close closecloseclosecloseclose0.046 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera Mini 8.0.40313Presto 2.12.423 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.366 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mini 8.0Presto 2.12.423 mobile:featureyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 12.16closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera Mini 8.0close OperaMini 5Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:09 | by ThaDafinser