User agent detail

AdsBot-Google-Mobile (+http://www.google.com/mobile/adsbot.html) Mozilla (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 3 0 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/bots/generic.yaml
yesGoogle Ads Bot Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesAdsBot Google-MobileBot/Crawler0.03601 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 537.36closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari closeiOS RobotBot or Crawlermobile-browseryescloseclose0.182 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yesGooglebotSearch bot0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesAdsBot-Googleclose0 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeiPhone OS closecloseclosecloseclose0.052 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mobile Safari WebKit 537.36iOS 3AppleiPhonecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.407 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesGoogle Ads Botclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari closeiOS AppleiPhoneSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:09 | by ThaDafinser