User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.1; X920 Build/JOP40D) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/32.0.1700.102 YaBrowser/14.2.1700.12535.00 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SonyEricssonX920 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Yandex Browser 14.2Blink Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.06102 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 32.0.1700.102closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Yandex Browser 14.2.1700.12535.00closeAndroid 4.2.1X920mobile-browseryescloseclose0.286 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Yandex Browser 14.2Blink Android 4.2yes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Yandex 14.2.1700.12535.00closeAndroid 4.2.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Yandex Browser 14.2.1700closeAndroid 4.2.1SonyEricssonX920closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
ABrowse closeAndroid 4.2.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.05 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Yandex Browser 14.2.1700.12535.0WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.406 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Yandex Browser 14.2Blink Android 4.2.1X920mobile:smartyescloseclose0.076 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 32.0.1700.102closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.2closeAndroid 4.2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.05402 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:09 | by ThaDafinser